The Actor Model and Distributed Systems: nyssr.net Compared to Akka

The Actor Model is a powerful paradigm for developing highly concurrent and distributed systems. It has been adopted by many frameworks and programming languages, including Akka, Erlang, Elixir, Go, Scala, Pony , Microsoft Orleans, Thespian, and Celluloid.
Currently,
Shared Characteristics of nyssr .net and Akka
Although there are key differences,
- JVM-Based:
Both frameworks run on the JVM.
nyssr .net uses Java, while Akka supports both Java and Scala. - Scalability and Distribution: Both are designed for developing distributed, scalable backend solutions.
- Actor Model Implementation: They use the Actor Model to manage concurrency and parallelism.
- Clustering and Scaling: They enable the clustering of nodes and scale by simply adding new nodes.
- Asynchronous Messaging: Communication between actors occurs via asynchronous messages, making the systems more responsive.
- Transparent Communication: Both systems provide Location Transparency, where it doesn't matter which node a recipient actor is located on.
- Automated Error Handling: They include mechanisms for automatic error handling within the system, which increases robustness.
- Network Protocols: Both use their own TCP-based protocols to manage communication and detect new or failing nodes.
- Security Features: Both offer TLS encryption to secure message traffic.
- Encapsulation of Complexity: They encapsulate the complexity of asynchronicity and concurrency, allowing developers to focus on business logic.
Key Differences: nyssr .net in Detail
This is where
1. Topology and Routing
- Network Topology: While Akka primarily uses a star-shaped clustering architecture (with seed nodes),
nyssr .net is built on a wide-area mesh network. Each node knows the network as a graph, not just a list of direct connections. - Routing: Messages are forwarded dynamically and along the shortest path (based on latency). Akka typically uses direct connections between cluster nodes.
- No Seed Nodes: New nodes can join the network without the need for fixed seed nodes.
- Heterogeneous Environments:
nyssr .net is designed to function even in environments with firewalls, where nodes are often not directly reachable.
2. Messaging and Services
- Protocols:
nyssr .net forgoes a gossip protocol and instead uses broadcasts that trigger nano-services on the nodes. - Message Features: Messages can be assigned priorities and are automatically compressed or encrypted via simple header bits (in addition to TLS).
- Service Architecture: Instead of Cluster Sharding,
nyssr .net uses distributed service registries for load balancing and service resolution. - Messaging Features: It supports automatic replies, broadcasts, forwarding, and an Observer pattern.
- Addressing: Actor addresses are not hierarchical and contain no network information (IP/Port). They serve solely to locate actors.
3. Specific Use Cases
- Frontend Capabilities: A unique strength of
nyssr .net is its ability to act as a server-based, distributed frontend that provides Micro-UIs for web and Swing applications. - Code Distribution: Nodes do not need to share the same code base. Plugins make it possible to host different services on different nodes.
- Distributed Factories: The framework works extensively with distributed factories that can create instances of similar actors.
- Session and Rights Management:
nyssr .net offers deep-level session and user rights management that is granular down to the message level. - Error Handling: While similar to Akka,
nyssr .net actively involves the sender of messages in error handling through automatic replies. - Namespaces: Namespaces enable thousands of identical applications to be hosted on the same node without address conflicts.
4. Additional Architectures
- Hierarchical State Machines: Actors can use hierarchical state machines, which simplifies the modeling of complex states.
- Cluster Interconnection: Multiple
nyssr .net clusters can be interconnected. - Dependencies:
nyssr .net has very few external library dependencies, which simplifies integration into existing applications. - Platform-Independent Serialization: Messages are always platform-independently serialized to ensure interoperability (unlike Java serialization, which is only suitable for Java-based systems).